मुख पृष्ठ » Philosophy of Mind » Concept of Self in Hume and Buddha

Concept of Self in Hume and Buddha

Article Index

Live in Today

मई 2008
सोम मंगल बुध गुरु शुक्र शनि रवि
« अप्रैल   नवम्बर »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Concept of Self in Hume and Buddha

Desh Raj Sirswal

ICPR-JRF, Department of Philosophy, K.U.K.

Abstract:

The aim of this paper is to give a descriptive analysis of the conception of self in eastern and western tradition with special reference to David Hume and the Buddha. David Hume concludes that self is merely a composition of successive impressions. Philosophers call Hume’s theory of self as a “bundle theory of mind” and again Hume says, “I may venture to affirm of the rest of mankind, that they are nothing but a bundle or collection of different perceptions, which succeed each other with an inconceivable rapidity, and are in a perpetual flux and movement.”  We can easily consider that like other substances Hume also denies the self. We can compare this idea of Hume with Buddha. The Buddha denies the existence of any permanent entity either physical or mental. He considers the human person as a psychophysical complex. For him all worldly things are momentary and likewise the self is not more than it and rejects commonly believed conception of self. But how, it may be asked, does he then explain the continuity of a person through different births, or even through the different states of childhood, youth and old age? Though denying the continuity of an identical substance in man, Buddha does not deny the continuity of the stream of successive states that compose his life….This continuity is often explained with the example of  a lamp burning throughout the night….The existence of man depends on this collection and it dissolves when the collection breaks up. The self or the ego denotes nothing more than this collection. But there is also much difference between Hume’s and Buddha’s conception of self. We can conclude that both describe self in empirical sense not as a metaphysical entity.

 Note:

This paper is presented at 44th session of the All India Oriental Conference held on 28-30 July,2008 at Kurukshetra University,Kurukshetra.


1 टिप्पणी

  1. nexus filter says:

    […] which is the source of an idiosyncratic consciousness.Moreover, this self is agent responsible for thttps://niyamak.wordpress.com/2008/05/21/concept-of-self-in-hume-and-buddha/A Naturalistic Approach to Buddhist Karma &amp RebirthDT Strain, 2006 Note: good prerequisites to […]

एक उत्तर दें

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / बदले )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / बदले )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / बदले )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / बदले )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: